Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers
You are not logged in.
Please note: The forum's URL has changed. The new URL is: https://molcasforum.univie.ac.at. Please update your bookmarks!
You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".Dear team,
I try to run the calculation of CASPT2/ANO-RCC-VTZP (12/12) optimization for singlet NUN (nitrogen-uranium-nitrogen) molecule on the ground state employing Molcas 8.0 (molcas-8.0-15.06.18_CentOS_6.6_x86_64). As shown below, which come from my .log file, geometry is converged in 21 iterations to a minimum structure, however, I gain three imaginary frequencies after numerical differentiation is finished. (During the whole process of my CASPT2 geometry optimization, I often check my active space and find it is always correct. The last time occurs after geometry is converged, I use the final structure and corresponding .RasOrb to generate .grid, and then find that my active space still does not change.)
19 -28059.69744139 -0.00000065 0.000552-0.002525 nrc006 0.021889 nrc004 -28059.69744660 RS-RFO BFGS 0
20 -28059.69742367 0.00001772 0.005706 0.003292 nrc003 0.020563 nrc004 -28059.69744205 RS-RFO BFGS 0
21 -28059.69744138 -0.00001771 0.000312 0.000174 nrc003 0.000348 nrc004 -28059.69744142 RS-RFO BFGS 0
+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+
+ Cartesian Displacements + Gradient in internals +
+ Value Threshold Converged? + Value Threshold Converged? +
+-----+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+
+ RMS + 0.3020E-03 0.1200E-02 Yes + 0.1562E-03 0.3000E-03 Yes +
+-----+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+
+ Max + 0.3902E-03 0.1800E-02 Yes + 0.1736E-03 0.4500E-03 Yes +
+-----+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+
Geometry is converged in 21 iterations to a Minimum Structure
*****************************************************************************************************************
Numerical differentiation is finished!
Observe that the harmonic oscillator analysis is only valid at stationary points!
Note that rotational and translational degrees have been automatically removed.
Harmonic frequencies in cm-1
IR Intensities in km/mol
1 2 3 4 5 6
Frequency: i1024.97 i36.21 i12.30 368.88 1092.24 1186.89
Intensity: 0.447E+02 0.533E+02 0.389E+01 0.394E+02 0.485E+03 0.329E+02
Please help me out with your invaluable suggestions. Thank you very much!
Best regards,
huangtf
Last edited by huangtf (2017-07-06 09:21:29)
Offline
Perturb the geometry along the imaginary frequency mode and try optimizing from there. Linear molecules are tricky, numerical differentiations are tricky.
Offline
Dear Ignacio,
Thanks a lot for your kind and helpful reply last time! I've tried your method several times, and it really works. Unfortunately, because of limited time, I'm forced to use symmetry (C2v) and obtain a minimum with all real frequencies at last. (see below)
IR Intensities in km/mol
1 2 3 4 5 6
Frequency: i13.50 3.95 70.00 698.87 1036.59 1093.01
Intensity: 0.393E+00 0.155E-01 0.974E+02 0.847E+02 0.257E-01 0.511E+03
IR Intensities in km/mol
1 2
Frequency: 1035.37 1093.52
Intensity: 0.308E-03 0.511E+03
Sincerely yours,
huangtf
Last edited by huangtf (2017-07-24 09:20:45)
Offline