Molcas Forum

Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Welcome to the Molcas forum. You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".

#1 2025-06-01 11:45:30

SANA123456
Member
Registered: 2025-06-01
Posts: 2

ROHF vs UHF

Dear All,

I am a new user of OpenMolcas  and have been conducting calculations on the FeH molecule, incorporating the Douglas-Kroll-Hess (DKH) relativistic correction.
I observed that the energy from the Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) calculation (Total SCF energy: -1271.4458522848 au) aligns well with results from other computational packages. However, the Restricted Open-Shell Hartree-Fock (ROHF) calculation yields significantly different results:

Average CI energy: -1204.89488278 au
RASSCF energy for state 1: -1204.89488278 au

These discrepancies are unexpected. I have attached the input files for both calculations for your reference.
Could you please advise on the possible reasons for this discrepancy? Specifically, are there any options or settings I should adjust in the ROHF calculation to achieve energy results comparable to those from the UHF calculation?

Thank you for your assistance.

----------------------------------------------------
ROHF input file
----------------------------------------------------

&GATEWAY
  Title = FeH Ground State UHF Calculation
  Symmetry
    XY  Y

 Douglas-Kroll

 Basis set
    Fe.CC-PVTZ-DK...
    Fe 0.00000 0.00000 0.000000 bohr
  End of Basis

  Basis set
    H.CC-PVTZ-DK...
    H 0.000000 0.000000 1.600000 bohr
  End of Basis

End of Input

&SEWARD
End of Input

&RASSCF
  Title = FeH Ground State ROHF Calculation
  Spin = 4
  Nactel = 3 0 0
  Inactive = 7 0 3 2
  Ras2 = 1 0 1 1
  Ciroot = 1 1 1
End of Input

----------------------------------------------------
UHF input file
---------------------------------------------------

&GATEWAY
  Title = FeH Ground State UHF Calculation
  Symmetry
    XY  Y
 Douglas-Kroll

 Basis set
    Fe.CC-PVTZ-DK...
    Fe 0.00000 0.00000 0.000000 bohr
  End of Basis

  Basis set
    H.CC-PVTZ-DK...
    H 0.000000 0.000000 1.600000 bohr
  End of Basis

End of Input

&SEWARD
End of Input

&SCF
  Title = FeH Ground State UHF Calculation
  UHF
  Charge = 0
  zSpin = 3
End of Input

Offline

#2 2025-06-02 14:24:30

Ignacio
Administrator
From: Uppsala
Registered: 2015-11-03
Posts: 1,204

Re: ROHF vs UHF

Is the symmetry of your RASSCF state correct? If I understand it correctly, you want singly occupied orbitals of symmetries 1, 3 and 4. Shouldn't the state symmetry be 2 in that case?

Offline

#3 2025-06-02 17:10:09

SANA123456
Member
Registered: 2025-06-01
Posts: 2

Re: ROHF vs UHF

Yes, you are right.
I checked the symmetries and there was a mistake.
It works now with the following input file.

&GATEWAY
  Title = FeH Ground State UHF Calculation
  Symmetry
    XY  Y

 Douglas-Kroll

 Basis set
    Fe.CC-PVTZ-DK...
    Fe 0.00000 0.00000 0.000000 bohr
  End of Basis

  Basis set
    H.CC-PVTZ-DK...
    H 0.000000 0.000000 1.600000 bohr
  End of Basis


End of Input

&SEWARD
End of Input


&RASSCF
  Title = FeH Ground State ROHF Calculation
  Spin = 4
  Nactel = 3 0 0
  Inactive = 7 3 0 2
  Ras2 = 1 0 1 1
  Ciroot = 1 1 1
End of Input

Thanks

Last edited by SANA123456 (2025-06-02 17:10:38)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB 1.5.11

Last refresh: Today 00:04:23