Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers
You are not logged in.
Please note: The forum's URL has changed. The new URL is: https://molcasforum.univie.ac.at. Please update your bookmarks!
You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".Dear all,
When I performed the geometric optimization using the default convergence criteria, I found that the values of RMS and MAX of displacements were already below the convergence criteria threshold, but the program still judged NO, and there were asterisks alongside “NO”, what does it mean? How to solve it? I really appreciate your answer.
+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+
+ Cartesian Displacements + Gradient in internals +
+ Value Threshold Converged? + Value Threshold Converged? +
+-----+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+
+ RMS + 3.2532E-04 1.2000E-03 No * + 1.9420E-04 3.0000E-04 Yes +
+-----+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+
+ Max + 1.0981E-03 1.8000E-03 No * + 7.3525E-04 4.5000E-04 No +
+-----+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+
Convergence not reached yet!
Offline
I believe it's because the step was restricted or truncated (in internal coordinates), so any conclusion about the step size is not reliable.
Offline
I believe it's because the step was restricted or truncated (in internal coordinates), so any conclusion about the step size is not reliable.
Dear Ignacio, Yes, it was a constrained geometry optimization with one fixed bond length. Thank you for your answer.
Offline
It's not necessarily related to constraints. The thing is in any optimization (constrained or not), the step length is controlled such that it doesn't become too large (where the optimization method would be unreliable and which could produce unphysical geometries). See the MaxStep keyword. Whenever such restriction is hit, you have an asterisk in the iteration table and displacements are not considered as converged.
Offline
It's not necessarily related to constraints. The thing is in any optimization (constrained or not), the step length is controlled such that it doesn't become too large (where the optimization method would be unreliable and which could produce unphysical geometries). See the MaxStep keyword. Whenever such restriction is hit, you have an asterisk in the iteration table and displacements are not considered as converged.
Dear Ignacio, thank your for explaining this issue more clearer. In the input file, MaxStep was 0.1, which was smaller than the default value. Now I understand that the asterisk means the result is not reliable, even the value is below the threshold.
Offline