Molcas Forum

Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Welcome to the Molcas forum. You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".

#1 2020-09-08 13:56:10

amanuv
Member
Registered: 2019-05-07
Posts: 12

[SOLVED] Crystal field parameters of total J for a system contain Eu2+

Hi Everyone,
I am computing crystal field parameter for a system containing metal Eu2+, total J=7/2, which has f7 configuration equivalent to Gd3+. For computing the crystal field parameter, my input was:

&single_aniso
mltp
4
2 2 2 2

This provided me crystal field parameters for each multiplet for ground J in Eu2+. Now I want to describe set of crystal field parameters for whole J=7/2.

Is there a way, I can transform these crystal field parameter of pseudo-spin Hamiltonian for each multiplet to total J of the system?

As for as I know, to compute Gd3+, It is easy by introducing keyword:

&single_aniso
mltp
4
2 2 2 2
Crys
Gd

It will compute for total J=7/2 for gorund.

I went through the following paper, but I couldn’t find any translation of crystal field parameter from multiplet to total J or maybe I couldn’t understand completely.
L. F. Chibotaru, L.Ungur, J. Chem. Phys., 137, 064112 (2012)

Any help will be appreciated.

Thank you

Offline

#2 2020-09-10 09:15:41

nikolay
Member
From: Stuttgart
Registered: 2016-03-21
Posts: 55

Re: [SOLVED] Crystal field parameters of total J for a system contain Eu2+

If I understand correctly, if you want to treat S=7/2 all together, you should ask to read four doublets as part of an octet. It should be fine to use Crys=Gd as it is there to define the number of f electrons in the system.

&single_aniso
mltp
1
8
Crys
Gd

Offline

#3 2020-09-10 10:26:01

amanuv
Member
Registered: 2019-05-07
Posts: 12

Re: [SOLVED] Crystal field parameters of total J for a system contain Eu2+

@nikolay, thank you very much, It solved my problem.

In both cases, cystal field parameters are the same. I was able to compare the  Extended Stevens Operators (ESO), they are the same.

Thanks again.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB 1.5.11

Last refresh: Today 06:40:51