Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers
You are not logged in.
Please note: The forum's URL has changed. The new URL is: https://molcasforum.univie.ac.at. Please update your bookmarks!
You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".Pages: 1
Dear developers,
According to the molcas manual, both energy and gradient computations are feasible in the ESPF module. So I wonder is there possible to calculate a QM/MM system gradient via ESPF. Thanks in advance!
Best Regards!
Offline
Dear developers,
According to the molcas manual, both energy and gradient computations are feasible in the ESPF module. So I wonder is there possible to calculate a QM/MM system gradient via ESPF. Thanks in advance!
Best Regards!
Hi David,
QM/MM gradients are definitively available. See the Tinker keywords in Gateway and ESPF modules. In case you have to use link atom(s), you probably need to use the LAMOrokuma keyword in ESPF. Also, rHidden is Slapaf helps the convergence of a geometry optimization.
Hope this helps,
Nicolas
Offline
Hi nicolas,
Thank you for your reply! I prepare for a QM/MM nonadiabatic dynamics task, and it requires Molcas provides QM/MM gradient, NACs... However, molcas output file seems does not print QM/MM gradient automatically, therefore, can I print QM/MM gradient by employing some key words or other?
Best regards!
Offline
However, molcas output file seems does not print QM/MM gradient automatically, therefore, can I print QM/MM gradient by employing some key words or other?
Hi David,
1) You may increase the level of printing using the MOLCAS_PRINT env variable (see https://molcas.gitlab.io/OpenMolcas/sph … _emil.html)
2) Note that Molcas is not aware of all QM and MM atoms, unless you have included all of them in the QMMM part in Tinker key file. Accordingly, it may not print gradient contributions for some (most?) MM atoms.
Offline
Pages: 1