Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers
You are not logged in.
Please note: The forum's URL has changed. The new URL is: https://molcasforum.univie.ac.at. Please update your bookmarks!
You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".Hi,
I just wanted to confirm that i have the right idea with my input file to optimize the geometry of a large molecule (trimer)
the following is the coordinates (xyz)
76
Angstrom
C 0.627220000 2.735180000 -0.039130000
C -0.767560000 2.692480000 -0.032830000
C -1.431230000 1.460770000 -0.050390000
C -0.698850000 0.270680000 -0.046170000
C 0.717630000 0.303400000 0.014040000
C 1.365060000 1.545440000 -0.021810000
C -1.341540000 -0.958560000 -0.096100000
C -0.598740000 -2.139450000 -0.115400000
C 0.802500000 -2.150830000 0.036400000
C 1.445340000 -0.901310000 0.131720000
C 2.881840000 -0.748550000 0.478380000
N 3.506020000 0.373270000 -0.043720000
C 2.846800000 1.594100000 -0.107680000
C -2.916280000 1.416740000 -0.051360000
N -3.510240000 0.159360000 -0.066890000
C -2.816060000 -1.043610000 -0.112970000
O 3.415420000 -1.520300000 1.267130000
O 3.411920000 2.679370000 -0.196440000
O -3.535680000 2.474710000 -0.033960000
O -3.357910000 -2.144050000 -0.148290000
C 1.487850000 -3.459080000 0.063200000
C 4.955880000 0.403200000 -0.023900000
C -4.957210000 0.061000000 -0.032330000
C 2.752680000 -3.854990000 -0.319820000
C 3.009190000 -5.234980000 -0.155510000
C 1.864850000 -5.911220000 0.212610000
S 0.625440000 -4.837960000 0.646520000
F 3.648700000 -3.058070000 -0.839140000
C 1.646480000 -7.326030000 0.217920000
S 2.898480000 -8.394630000 0.634550000
C 2.033380000 -9.770510000 0.059860000
C 0.756810000 -9.385080000 -0.293070000
C 0.496840000 -8.006640000 -0.126800000
F -0.144340000 -10.191590000 -0.788770000
C 4.109900000 -11.091050000 -0.218440000
C 2.720140000 -11.073530000 0.008550000
C 2.074740000 -12.316370000 0.142280000
C 2.779060000 -13.525280000 -0.023050000
C 4.189420000 -13.503840000 -0.153610000
C 4.840360000 -12.283240000 -0.239970000
C 2.112740000 -14.757120000 -0.038440000
C 2.834020000 -15.953420000 -0.101930000
C 4.228920000 -15.926020000 -0.158380000
C 4.907640000 -14.701950000 -0.194260000
C 6.389960000 -14.676340000 -0.260500000
N 6.996380000 -13.421770000 -0.299990000
C 6.313310000 -12.212620000 -0.336300000
C 0.661500000 -12.450020000 0.567850000
N -0.007670000 -13.546900000 0.054460000
C 0.625110000 -14.777700000 -0.062520000
O 7.003300000 -15.738850000 -0.268740000
O 6.860050000 -11.120130000 -0.425940000
O 0.186230000 -11.682270000 1.396490000
O 0.037090000 -15.850110000 -0.153490000
C 8.444370000 -13.334700000 -0.316970000
C -1.455190000 -13.536220000 0.126190000
H 1.136490000 3.697910000 -0.056920000
H -1.332910000 3.623220000 -0.028640000
H -1.155200000 -3.070980000 -0.224560000
H 5.366300000 -0.607880000 -0.112830000
H 5.292950000 0.850440000 0.915960000
H 5.321660000 1.010190000 -0.858570000
H -5.443410000 1.038540000 -0.019840000
H -5.250290000 -0.496690000 0.864180000
H -5.297460000 -0.501260000 -0.908620000
H 3.950850000 -5.707180000 -0.405050000
H -0.451770000 -7.540150000 -0.360560000
H 4.662610000 -10.161660000 -0.358730000
H 2.312660000 -16.909370000 -0.108280000
H 4.783050000 -16.863220000 -0.189110000
H 8.924010000 -14.315220000 -0.317450000
H 8.771250000 -12.774980000 0.566650000
H 8.758920000 -12.776660000 -1.206050000
H -1.836390000 -12.511090000 0.056750000
H -1.772450000 -13.976160000 1.075380000
H -1.868840000 -14.124120000 -0.699350000
Because the molecule is large i am employing OneOnly (integral-direct) within the SEWARD. Do i need to use both DIREct and ONEOnly or will ONEOnly suffice?
As well, i was not sure if i need to place the GRID_IT within the loop as all i care about is the final optimized geometry and orbitals at that point. I
&GATEWAY
coord=ndi.xyz
basis=6-31g**
>> Do While
&SEWARD
DIREct
ONEOnly
&SCF
KSDFT=B3LYP
&GRID_IT
All
Dense
&SLAPAF
>>> EndDo
Last edited by damasu (2019-08-03 16:11:50)
Offline
I'm not sure about DIRECT/ONEONLY, you better try (you could try with a smaller system first). But my recommendation would be using RICD instead.
As for GRID_IT, if you are only interested in the final geometry, you can write it after SLAPAF.
Offline
you are suggesting something like
&GATEWAY
coord=ndi.xyz
basis=6-31g**
RICD
>> Do While
&SEWARD
&SCF
KSDFT=B3LYP
&SLAPAF
>>> EndDo
&GRID_IT
All
Dense
RICD will help speed up the calculation, but my only fear is that the OneInt file in scratch will be huge or that will not occur?
Last edited by damasu (2019-08-03 18:32:25)
Offline
I've never had problems with the size of the OneInt file. The OrdInt (2-electron integrals) file is indeed a problem, but that disappears with RICD too. Another reason is that I believe DIRECT doesn't work with all methods (only SCF and maybe MP2, I guess), while RICD does (at least for the non-legacy codes).
Offline
Thanks, my calculation has been running, without any issues with file size.
Offline