Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers
You are not logged in.
Please note: The forum's URL has changed. The new URL is: https://molcasforum.univie.ac.at. Please update your bookmarks!
You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".Hi Molcas Community,
I am interested in calculating the spin orbit coupling between the low laying T and S excited states, but I cannot figure out how to lower the print threshold of the Complex SO-Hamiltonian matrix in the spin-orbit section of the RASSI module.
In the example below I would like to lower the threshold to around 100 cm-1 and I do not want to calculate less states to compromise the quality of the energy of SO-states. Is there a keyword I could use? I cannot find anything in the manual.
Complex SO-Hamiltonian matrix elements over
spin components of spin-free eigenstates (SFS):
(In cm-1. Print threshold: 1200.000 cm-1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I1 S1 MS1 I2 S2 MS2 Real part Imag part Absolute
28 1.0 -1.0 1 0.0 0.0 -1386.647 -0.122 1386.647
30 1.0 1.0 1 0.0 0.0 -1386.647 0.122 1386.647
31 1.0 -1.0 29 1.0 0.0 1.142 1243.214 1243.215
32 1.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 -0.000 1960.581 1960.581
32 1.0 0.0 28 1.0 -1.0 -1.142 1243.214 1243.215
32 1.0 0.0 30 1.0 1.0 1.142 1243.214 1243.215
33 1.0 1.0 29 1.0 0.0 -1.142 1243.214 1243.215
37 1.0 -1.0 7 0.0 0.0 1.953 1446.536 1446.538
39 1.0 1.0 7 0.0 0.0 1.953 -1446.536 1446.538
40 1.0 -1.0 8 0.0 0.0 -0.713 -1466.675 1466.675
42 1.0 1.0 8 0.0 0.0 -0.713 1466.675 1466.675
43 1.0 -1.0 35 1.0 0.0 -0.812 -1526.113 1526.113
44 1.0 0.0 34 1.0 -1.0 0.812 -1526.113 1526.113
44 1.0 0.0 36 1.0 1.0 -0.812 -1526.113 1526.113
45 1.0 1.0 35 1.0 0.0 0.812 -1526.113 1526.113
52 1.0 -1.0 50 1.0 0.0 -0.691 1265.752 1265.752
53 1.0 0.0 49 1.0 -1.0 0.691 1265.752 1265.752
53 1.0 0.0 51 1.0 1.0 -0.691 1265.752 1265.752
54 1.0 1.0 50 1.0 0.0 0.691 1265.752 1265.752
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you!
Laura C. Motta
Offline
Isn't the SOCOupling keyword what you are looking for?
Offline
Yes! It worked perfectly! I do not know how I missed that keyword in the manual!
Thank you!
Laura
Offline