Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers
You are not logged in.
Please note: The forum's URL has changed. The new URL is: https://molcasforum.univie.ac.at. Please update your bookmarks!
You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".Pages: 1
Hello everybody,
I try to do an optimization of dublet/quartet H3 /6-31G**.
---------
&GATEWAY
coord=H3_optvib_dubl_1.Opt.xyz
basis=6-31G**
>>> EXPORT MOLCAS_MAXITER=150
>>> DO WHILE
&SEWARD
&GUGA
SPIN = 2
ELEC = 3
NACT = 3 0
INACT = 0 0
CIALL = 1
PRINT = 5
&ALASKA
&SLAPAF
>>> END DO
&McKinley
&GRID_IT
ALL
---------
After the detection of the Cs-Symmetriy, the output gives....
---------
..
..
ORBITALS PER SYMMETRY
1 2
INACTIVE 0 0
ACTIVE 0 0
VALENCE 0 0
CORE 0 0
ONEOCC 0 0
--- Stop Module: guga at Fri Mar 15 09:22:49 2019 /rc=-1 ---
*** files: xmldump
..
...
---------
To be honest, the input is not totally clear to me, because I am not sure, wheter to use a symmetry adapted or an Openmolcas specific input. Here I used the former input, because there are 3 elect. in A' and 0 in A''. This have been fond by a former scf calculation.
The output shows that there are 0 active -WHY ???
It would be very kind, if someone shows me the mistake in my input, or whatever goes wrong.
Thank you in advance !
Best greetings !
Alfred
Offline
I think you want to use ACTIve (number of active orbitals) instead of NACT (number of active electrons, alternative to ELEC).
I also believe GUGA will not give you any energy, you have to run e.g. MRCI after... and I'm not sure gradients are supported (not even numerical).
Offline
Pages: 1