Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers
You are not logged in.
Please note: The forum's URL has changed. The new URL is: https://molcasforum.univie.ac.at. Please update your bookmarks!
You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".Dear molcas experts,
I noticed that molcas has included the surface hopping dynamic module. I wonder is it possible to perform QMMM dynamic? I have done QMMM (with tinker) geometry optimization before, during every QM step, a large number of MM part micro steps were done to minimize the energy. If I want to perform a QMMM dynamic, how would I avoiding MM part minimize the energy and maintain its temperature.
Here, I tried to write an input file, but not tested yet.
&GATEWAY
tinker
BASIS= 6-31G
GROUP= nosym
>>> FOREACH ITER IN (1 .. 2000)
&SEWARD
&ESPF
external
tinker mulliken
>>> IF ($ITER == 1)
&RASSCF
LUMORB
FileOrb= $Project.GssOrb
Symmetry= 1
Spin= 1
nActEl= 6 0 0
Inactive= 12
RAS2= 5
CIroot= 2 2 1
>>> COPY $Project.JobIph $Project.JobOld
>>> END IF
&RASSCF
JOBIPH
CIRESTART
Symmetry= 1
Spin= 1
nActEl= 6 0 0
Inactive= 12
RAS2= 5
CIroot= 2 2 1
MDRLXR= 2
>>> COPY $Project.JobIph $Project.JobOld
&SURFACEHOP
TULLY
SUBSTEP = 200
DECOHERENCE = 0.1
PSUB
&ALASKA
&DYNAMIX
VELVer
DT= 10.0
VELO= 1
THER= 1
TEMP=300
HOP=1
>>> END FOREACH
Best regard,
shuo
Last edited by shuoshuo (2018-06-11 08:24:10)
Offline
Hi, I don't have experience with the dynamics module, hence I can't comment on your input file.
About the MM minimization, you can simply avoid it by freezing most (or all) the MM atoms. This is achieved by using the Tinker's keyword ACTIVE in the key file.
Hope this helps.
Offline