Molcas Forum

Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Welcome to the Molcas forum.

Please note: The forum's URL has changed. The new URL is: https://molcasforum.univie.ac.at. Please update your bookmarks!

You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".

#1 2022-02-10 18:11:13

JakobS
Member
Registered: 2022-02-10
Posts: 5

Availability of orbital-free embedding gradients

Hi! I'm trying to use the OFEM keyword in Alaska to compute analytic orbital-free embedding gradients. However, I'm not sure about how to put together the Molcas input.
Skimming through the source code, orbital-free embedding gradients seem to be implemented together with density fitting, but this feature does not seem very well tested/documented and I can't find any literature which uses it.

Starting from the Br2--H2O test (test/grayzone/898.input), I simply replaced the CASPT2 section with a call to Alaska:

&ALASKA
  root=1
  OFEM=ldtf/pbe

(... and removed the CIonly and Fake RICD keywords from the RASSCF/Seward module)

I find that MCLR runs fine but ALASKA terminates with:

 ###############################################################################
 ###############################################################################
 ###                                                                         ###  
 ###                                                                         ###  
 ###    Location: get_dArray                                                 ###  
 ###                                                                         ###  
 ###                                                                         ###  
 ###    Data of wrong length:Nuclear charge                                  ###  
 ###                                                                         ###  
 ###                                                                         ###  
 ###############################################################################
 ###############################################################################

Is that the intended use of the OFEM keyword in Alaska? It seems to me that there's something wrong with the way I set up the RunFile in connection with the BSSE keyword (which follows the standard instructions of a OFEM calculation) which leads to an unexpected number of nuclei on the RunFile.

Thanks for any directions!

Cheers,
Jakob

Offline

#2 2022-02-11 14:21:40

Ignacio
Administrator
From: Uppsala
Registered: 2015-11-03
Posts: 1,085

Re: Availability of orbital-free embedding gradients

Well, since it's not tested, I guess the functionality is as good as broken (even if it didn't crash). You could file a bug report.

Offline

#3 2022-02-15 09:49:53

JakobS
Member
Registered: 2022-02-10
Posts: 5

Re: Availability of orbital-free embedding gradients

Thanks a lot for the information Ignacio! I'll consider that.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB 1.5.11

Last refresh: Today 16:54:50