Molcas Forum

Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Welcome to the Molcas forum. You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".

#1 2020-05-15 04:31:22

panwang
Member
Registered: 2020-02-19
Posts: 6

Convergence problem of CI optimization with QM/MM

Dear all,

I used the QM/MM in molcas to investiage the photochemistry of an organic molecule dissolved in water, I've successfully optimized the ground state and the first excited state geometries. However, when I try to optimize the MECI between the S0 and S1, I encountered a very difficult convergence problem. The energy oscillates back and forth between the two similar geometries, at first geometry:     
energy=   -1488.282710 (S0)
energy=   -1488.276618 (S1)

and at the second geometry:
      energy=   -1488.278701  (S1)
      energy=   -1488.273485  (S0)

The root-flip occurred and I have used the track keyword. I have tried to reduce the maxstep to 0.1 and it didnot help.

So, is there a way to deal with this situation. Thanks.

Following is my input:

> EXPORT  TINKER=$MOLCAS/tinker/bin
> COPY  /home/pwzhou/Fluorescein/QM-MM/TG/conical-opt/TG-conical-opt.xyz $WorkDir/TG-conical-opt.xyz
> COPY  /home/pwzhou/Fluorescein/QM-MM/TG/conical-opt/TG-conical-opt.key $WorkDir/TG-conical-opt.key
&Gateway
 RICD
 Tinker
 Basis=6-31G*
 Group=Nosym
 Constraints
  E = Ediff 1 2
 Values
  E = 0.0
 End of constraints
>>> EXPORT MOLCAS_MAXITER=300
>>> Do While
 &Seward
  DoAnalytical
 &Espf
  External=Tinker
  LAMorok
 &RASSCF
  LumOrb
  FileOrb=s1.RasOrb
  Spin=1
  Inactive=103
  NACTEL=12
  RAS2=12
  CIRoot=2 2 1
 &SLAPAF
  Maxstep = 0.1
  Cartesian
  rHidden = 20 angstrom
  Track
  THRS = 1.0e-4 3.0e-3
>>> EndDo
&CASPT2
 IPEAshift=0.0
 Multistate=2 1 2
 MAXIter=100

Offline

#2 2020-05-15 08:45:25

Ignacio
Administrator
From: Uppsala
Registered: 2015-11-03
Posts: 1,203

Re: Convergence problem of CI optimization with QM/MM

I'm not sure the Track keyword is any good for CI optimization. Try first without it. It could be that there is a root flipping with a higher state that you didn't include in the average, try with more states in CIRoot.

Offline

#3 2020-05-15 10:07:23

panwang
Member
Registered: 2020-02-19
Posts: 6

Re: Convergence problem of CI optimization with QM/MM

Thaks. Actually I first didnot use the Track keyword and the similar problem occurrs; then I added the Track keyword and the problem still occurrs.
I will try to increase more states, thanks.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB 1.5.11

Last refresh: Today 00:32:43