Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers
You are not logged in.
Please note: The forum's URL has changed. The new URL is: https://molcasforum.univie.ac.at. Please update your bookmarks!
You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".Hello,
I get strange results for oscillator strengths (but also energies) when trying to obtain excited state info with solvation. For acrolein as a model, I'm using the following input, which is mostly from page 68 of the Molcas 8.2 manual, but I'm extending it by including the RASSI module:
&GATEWAY
Title= Acrolein excited state with solvation
Coord=$MOLCAS/Coord/Acrolein.xyz; Basis= STO-3G; group= c1
RF-input
PCM-model; solvent= water
End of RF-input
End of Input
&SEWARD
&SCF
&RASSCF
Spin= 1; nActEl= 6 0 0; Inactive= 12; Ras2= 5
CiRoot= 1 1 1
End of Input
&CASPT2
Multistate= 1 1
RFPert
>> copy $Project.JobMix JOB001
End of Input
&RASSCF
Spin= 1; nActEl= 6 0 0; Inactive= 12; Ras2= 5
CiRoot= 5 5 1
RFRoot= 5
NONEquilibrium
End of Input
&CASPT2
Multistate= 1 5
RFPert
>> copy $Project.JobMix JOB002
End of Input
&RASSI
NRofJOBiph= 2 1 1; 1; 5
EJob
RFPert
End of Input
The RASSI module output that confuses me is:
SF State Relative EVAC(au) Rel lowest level(eV) D:o, cm**(-1)
1 -193.16016810 0.000000 0.000
2 52000.00000000 1420248.228938 11455074587.940
and
++ Dipole transition strengths:
----------------------------
for osc. strength at least 0.10000000E-04
To From Osc. strength Einstein coefficients Ax, Ay, Az (sec-1) Total A (sec-1)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 2 29098.452 0.25284467E+25 0.18421329E+23 0.46384610E+17 0.25468680E+25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The relative energies of the states reported by RASSI seem nonsensical, and the oscillator strength seems extremely large. Am I doing this correctly?
Thanks,
William Karney
William Karney
Prof. of Chemistry and Environmental Science
University of San Francisco
Offline
My personal conviction is that RASSI should simply not be used with jobiphs coming from different solvent calculations. Different solvent settings mean a different reaction field an a different Hamiltonian, but RASSI can only handle a single Hamiltonian, so the results are bound to be wrong.
Offline