Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers
You are not logged in.
Please note: The forum's URL has changed. The new URL is: https://molcasforum.univie.ac.at. Please update your bookmarks!
You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".Pages: 1
Dear all,
I have two questions about “Single-point multiconfigurational complete active space (CASSCF) and second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2) calculations were performed at the DFT-optimized geometries.”:
1. If I want to see some bonding and antibonding orbitals, just single-point CASSCF is enough, do you think so?
2. If I want to consider energies of different geometries, except for the intention in question 1, single-point CASSCF/CASPT2 is necessary, do you agree with me?
Please help me out! Thank you very much!
Sincerely yours,
huangtf
Offline
Dear Huangtf,
I don't understand your questions completly, but maybe I am wrong.
If you just want to see orbitals-bondig and antibonding-a simple SCF/UHF-calculation produces these results. Do you mean "the bonding/antibonding orbitals" of your molecule of interest, then you have to find out the active space.
Yor remarks are to less to find out what's really your problem.
However, I am also a beginner with OPENMOLCAS and this is a Forum, which all participants try to help each other.
Please be more detailed !
Greetings
Alfred Güthler
Offline
Dear Alfred,
Do you mean "the bonding/antibonding orbitals" of your molecule of interest, then you have to find out the active space.
Yes.
Your remarks are too less to find out what's really your problem.
Please see this paper (DOI: 10.1021/ic202503h), I don’t know the difference between CASSCF natural orbitals and CASPT2 natural orbitals.
Yours sincerely,
huangtf
Offline
Pages: 1