Molcas Forum

Support and discussions for Molcas and OpenMolcas users and developers

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Welcome to the Molcas forum.

Please note: The forum's URL has changed. The new URL is: https://molcasforum.univie.ac.at. Please update your bookmarks!

You can choose an avatar and change the default style by going to "Profile" → "Personality" or "Display".

#1 2024-02-29 15:02:57

turnsek
Member
Registered: 2023-12-14
Posts: 1

A possible bug in RASSI resulting in divergent osc. strengths?

Hi all!

I have been trying to calculate a simple PEC for the 3p excited state of helium. I can get converged orbitals with great energy accuracy using SA-RASSCF + RMS-CASPT2.
This is where the niceness ends though. When trying to calculate the oscillator strengths between the ground state and the excited states of sym. gr. 5 (in the D2h group) I get a ton of warnings of type:

 ###############################################################################
 ###############################################################################
 ###                                                                                                                                                  ###
 ###                                                                                                                                                  ###
 ###    WARNING: A possible bug was detected.                                                                            ###
 ###                                                                                                                                                  ###
 ###                                                                                                                                                  ###                                  
 ###############################################################################
 ###############################################################################
  WARNING: Non-zero matrix element computed
  which should be zero by spin symmetry!
               Spins S1, S2:   0.0000000000000000        0.0000000000000000     
  Spin projections SM1, SM2:   0.0000000000000000        0.0000000000000000     
     Operator has S=1.0, SM:   0.0000000000000000     
  Clebsch-Gordan:   0.0000000000000000     
  Size is TMATEL=   3.7325662560760975E-009

and the resulting osc. strengths are

++ Dipole transition strengths (spin-free states):
   -----------------------------------------------
     for osc. strength at least  1.00000000E-05

      From   To        Osc. strength     Einstein coefficients Ax, Ay, Az (sec-1)    Total A (sec-1)
     -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         1    2       5.20432021E+26  0.00000000E+00  0.00000000E+00  9.43286204E+36  9.43286204E+36
         1    3       1.67828202E+27  0.00000000E+00  0.00000000E+00  3.22359225E+37  3.22359225E+37
         1    4       1.35162735E+25  0.00000000E+00  0.00000000E+00  3.03314392E+35  3.03314392E+35
         1    5       8.65194149E+35  0.00000000E+00  0.00000000E+00  1.96774217E+46  1.96774217E+46
         1    6       1.04071829E+26  0.00000000E+00  0.00000000E+00  2.36695398E+36  2.36695398E+36
         1    7       2.41784030E+27  0.00000000E+00  0.00000000E+00  5.50554665E+37  5.50554665E+37
         1    8       2.81973328E+25  0.00000000E+00  0.00000000E+00  6.75361370E+35  6.75361370E+35
         1    9       1.39341170E+39  0.00000000E+00  0.00000000E+00  3.35527899E+49  3.35527899E+49
     -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(expected result would be right around 0.05.

The energies of the states and orbital population analyses are all as expected. I am using a large basis set [29,25,24,23](15,18,15,14) which I contracted just for this purpose and made sure to include the desired orbitals in the genano. The basis set exponents were taken from [10.1063/1.4772468].

Now for the worst part. The oscillator strengths calculated in this way for the states of sym. gr. 2 - the Pi states - are in quantitative agreement with the experiments.

I would very much appreciate it if anyone had any idea what might be the main culprit here. Thank you for your help!

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB 1.5.11

Last refresh: Today 17:28:14